• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Understanding the ADA

The Blog of William D. Goren, J.D. LL.M.

  • Home
  • About William D. Goren, J.D., LL.M.
  • William Goren’s Web Site
  • Contact

suitable position

Reassignment revisited

August 20, 2012 By William Goren 1 Comment

In a prior blog entry, I discussed how the issue of reassignment when an otherwise qualified person with a disability can no longer do the job would eventually be headed to the Supreme Court. However, that entry did not address the question as to how you go about proving up, i.e. making a prima facie case, for a reassignment claim as a reasonable accommodation. A case that answers this question is Bundy v. Chaves County Board of Commissioners, 2006 WL 6906700 (D. N.M. April 28, 2006). Keep in mind, that this case was likely unpublished, as only the Westlaw cite was available, and therefore, an attorney would need to check his or her local rule to see what kind of precedent this case may offer. Nevertheless, this case is useful for talking about how to make a reassignment claim and the defenses that an employer may have. In this case, the plaintiff wanted to be reassigned to a different position because they had a disability and could no longer do the job that they were in. Id. at**2-3. The problem that the plaintiff ran into was that he never furnished his medical records, and also that the entity he wanted to be transferred to, was actually a different entity than the one he was currently employed with. Id. at** 3-4, 10. Also, the court had a problem with the plaintiff looking toward the future with respect to jobs that may work for him even though he never submitted his medical records as the ADA works in the present. Id. at *9.

Nevertheless, the court did detail how do you go about proving a case involving reassignment and also when, in its opinion, a reassignment would be unreasonable. To make a prima facie case for reassignment, the court said that a plaintiff would have to show the following:

1) the plaintiff is a disabled person under the ADA and made any resulting limitation from his or her disability known to the employer; 2) the preferred option of accommodating the employee within his or her existing job could not be reasonably accomplished; 3) the employee requested the employer reasonably accommodate his or her disability with a reassignment to a vacant position, which the employee identified at the outset or which the employee requested the employer identify through the interactive process that was conducted by both parties in good faith; 4) the employee was qualified to perform one or more appropriate vacant jobs within the company with or without reasonable accommodations and that the employee specifically identified jobs that were available within the company at or about the time the request for reassignment was made; and 5) the employee suffered injury because the employer did not offer to reassign the employee to any appropriate vacant position. Id. at **6-7.

While these elements are instructive, make sure you check the law in your circuit. For example, as the aforementioned blog entry made clear, it may be debatable as to whether an otherwise qualified person with a disability is entitled to that vacant position as a matter of right or whether the employer has the ability to fill that position through competitive selection and just allow the person with a disability to apply for that position. Also, you want to check the case law in your jurisdiction to assess just how far the obligation of the employer goes with respect to helping the employee finding other suitable positions within the company. Finally, cases can vary widely in terms of when an employer will be deemed to know of an employee’s disability.

This case also went on to talk about how you can go about deciding whether a requested accommodation for reassignment is reasonable. First, the preferred option is always an accommodation that keeps the employee in his or her existing job that can be reasonably accomplished. Id. at *8. Second, reassignment must ordinarily result from the interactive process with both parties working together in good faith. Id. Third, the position does not require a promotion or redefinition of essential job requirements. Id. Fourth, the employer has the right to limit the option for reassignment in a way so that the reassignment does not violate other legitimate nondiscriminatory employment policies that are firmly established within the organization, such as seniority rights. Id. Finally, the employer has the right to figure out what position to reassign the employee to so long as the employer addresses the concerns noted in this paragraph.

Things to be thinking about in a reassignment case include: 1) Has the employee been evaluated to see whether with or without reasonable accommodations they can perform the essential functions of the job that they are currently in; 2) has the employer worked with the employee through the interactive process to evaluate what other positions are available; 3) what are the employer’s seniority policies, regardless of whether they are unionized or not?; 4) when does the employer consider a position vacant?; 5) where appropriate positions have been identified, has the employee been evaluated as to whether he or she can perform the essential functions of that job with or without reasonable accommodation in a manner in accordance with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act? and 6) is the transfer policy a question of competitive bidding or does the person with a disability have the right to that position if they are otherwise qualified?. With respect to the competitive bidding versus automatic right, preventive law would suggests that despite the,prior blog entry, , and especially where the position is vacant, much litigation could be prevented if an otherwise qualified individual with a disability were able to transfer into a vacant position as a matter of right.

Filed Under: Federal Cases, Title I Tagged With: Americans with Disabilities Act, appropriate position, appropriate vacant job, competitive bidding, competitive selection, disability, essential job functions, essential job requirements, existing job, good faith, identifying jobs, interactive process, matter of right, otherwise qualified, prima facie case, proving up, reasonable accommodation, reasonableness of reassignment request, reassignment, seniority policy, seniority rights, suitable position, transfer as a matter of right, vacant position, when reassignment is unreasonable

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe & Connect

  • RSS Feed for Posts
  • LinkedIn

Search

Now Available

Now Available

Understanding the ADA 4th Edition

Recent Posts

  • Litigation over commas: How far Does Title II Extend? April 16, 2018
  • Uber and Title III of the ADA April 9, 2018
  • To Buy or Not: The Amicus Brief in Robles and Winn-Dixie April 4, 2018
  • Colleges and Universities Duty to Warn Obligations; The ADA is Lurking March 28, 2018

2017 & 2016 FeedSpot Top 100 Legal Blog

2017 & 2016 FeedSpot Top 100 Legal Blog

2017 ABA Journal Web 100

2017 ABA Journal Web 100

ABA 2016 Blawg 100

ABA 2016 Blawg 100

ABA 2015 Blawg 100

ABA 2015 Blawg 100

ABA 2014 Blawg 100

ABA 2014 Blawg 100

ADA Legal Resources

  • Department of Justice ADA Web Site
  • Disability Discrimination, EEOC Info
  • DuPage County bar Journal, The Brief
  • Job Accommodation Network
  • Midwest Center for the Law and Deaf
  • National Association of Attorneys with Disabilities (NAAD)
  • Understanding the Americans with Disabilities Act

Articles

  • ADA and Mediation/Arbitration: Things to Think About
  • Affirmative-action and persons with disabilities
  • Americans with Disabilities Act Claims: Is a Mixed Motive Jury Instruction Dead?
  • An ADA Checklist as You Go About Your Practice
  • Disability compliance for higher education interview on why colleges and universities should perform ADA compliance audits
  • Expect huge impact from DOJ regulations implementing Titles II and III of ADAAA
  • Help your institution avoid some common mistakes when dismissing students with disabilities
  • Internet addiction, ADA, and employment
  • Internet and Title III of the ADA
  • Is Your University or College's Homepage Accessible to Prospective Students with Visual Impairments?
  • Legal Liability of Buying or Developing Inaccessible Technology
  • Reassignment and the ADA: Is It a Matter of Right and How Do You Prove It up?
  • Service dogs and the ADA
  • Should Your Law Firm's Internet Site Be Accessible to the Persons with Disabilities
  • The Americans with Disabilities Act and Employment
  • The Ins and Outs of Nevada’s Service Animal Laws
  • What is the statute of limitations for ADA claims

Blogroll

  • architectural accessibility
  • disability law blogspot
  • FMLA Insights Blog
  • labor and employment law blog (management)
  • Lawffice Space Blog
  • management employment law blog (California based firm)
  • Ohio Employment lawyer blog (Jonathan Hyman-management)
  • PLAINTIFF California labor and employment law blog
  • plaintiff employment law blog
  • Robin Shea's employment and labor law insider blog (management-Constangy, Brooks & Prophete)
  • Second Circuit civil rights cases
  • The blog for Supreme Court goings on
  • The employer handbook blog
  • Title III and Fair Housing Act Blog (defense)
  • Title III and II ADA blog
  • Title III blog business side (Seyfarth Shaw)
  • Workplace safety and health law blog

Greatest Hits

  • ADA and ADA Related Cases at the Supreme Court: Where They Have Been and What Is Next
  • ADA and the Applicable Statute of Limitations
  • ADA compliance auditing for higher education
  • ADA Compliance Is a Nondelegable Duty
  • Are public colleges and public universities immune from suit as a result of sovereign immunity in ADA matters
  • Can You Get Compensatory and Punitive Damages When Alleging Retaliation
  • Just When Does the Statute of Limitations BEGIN to Run in ADA Cases
  • Service dog v. therapy dogs
  • Suing state court system for title II violations
  • Temporary disabilities and the ADA
  • What do you have to show to get compensatory damages under title II of the ADA
  • What does it mean to exhaust administrative remedies under title I of the ADA?
  • Why a recent US Supreme Court opinion is a huge victory for title I plaintiffs (mixed motive)

In the Media

  • ABA Blawg 100 2014
  • ADA and ADR
  • ADA Game Changer: CRST Van Expedited v. EEOC
  • ADA Litigation Game Changer
  • Blog entry on Impact of University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar on the ADA
  • Blog entry on Judge Gorsuch on Disability Rights Linked to by SCOTUS Blog
  • Blog entry on Sheehan v. City and County of San Francisco
  • CBS money watch article discussing website accessibility litigation.
  • CRST Van Epedited blog entry referenced in over lawyered
  • Death Penalty and Intellectual Disabilities Supreme Court Opinion
  • Disability compliance for higher education interview on why colleges and universities should perform ADA compliance audits
  • Does title IIof the ADA/§ 504 of the Rehabilitation Act applied to employment
  • E-bay's Inaccessibility to the Deaf
  • EEOC affirmative action per § 501 blog entry referenced in March 2016 employment Law blog carnival
  • Employment Law Blog Carnival November 2015
  • Expert Interview Series: ADA Consultant William Goren on What You Need to Know About ADA Compliance
  • February 2016 employment Law blog carnival
  • Finding creative solutions within the law
  • Fisher II blog entry referenced in Scotus Blog
  • Fry oral argument blog entry referenced in Scotus Blog
  • Guest Post on Illinois Business Litigator Blog regarding My Burden of Proof When Dealing with Remediation Blog Entry
  • How Fry playing out blog entry referenced by Scotus blog
  • Illinois business litigator blog featuring my blog entry discussing whether a corporation has a retaliation cause of action under the ADA
  • Impact of Abercrombie and Fitch Decision on the ADA
  • June 2015 ABA Journal article on attorneys with disabilities and the preconceptions they face
  • Law practice today members spotlight
  • legal issues of buying inaccessible technologies article posted to the ABA green room
  • Legal pad radio show interview first run Wednesday, February 12 at 7:30am.; Re-airs at Saturday, February 15 at 3:30pm and Monday, February 17 at 9am
  • Legal pad radio show interview first run Wednesday, January 29 at 7:30am.; Re-airs at Saturday, February 1 at 3:30pm and Monday, February 3 at 9am
  • Legal pad radio show interview first run Wednesday, October 23rd at 7:30am.; Re-airs at Saturday, October 26th at 3:30pm and Monday, October 28th at 9am
  • Let's Talk About Arbitration blog entry and other entries featured on the Illinois business litigator blog
  • MH issues and the State Bar
  • Oral Argument in Sheehan v. City and County of San Francisco
  • PBS News Hour piece discussing accessibility of amusement parks for persons with disabilities
  • Reflections on the development of disability as a diversity concern in the legal profession
  • SCOTUS blog references Endrew oral argument blog entry
  • SCOTUS Blog references Fry decided blog entry
  • SCOTUS Blog referencing blog entry that Reviews Supreme Court cases and the upcoming Supreme Court cases vis a vis the ADA/disability rights
  • Sevorson decision analyzed
  • Sheehan decision
  • Trimble v. Kroger
  • What's wrong with this job description blog entry featured in December 2015 employment Law blog carnival
  • When to grant more leave after FMLA is exhausted
  • Why ADA is a Good Law

Presentations of interest

  • ADA Hot Issues: Essential Function, Attendance, and Reassignment
  • ADA Hot Issues: Pregnancy, Reassignment, and Legal Issues of Buying Inaccessible Technology
  • Let's Count the Ways the ADA Impacts Your Law Practice
  • Understanding the Americans with Disabilities Act, Fourth Edition – Hot Off the Press – A Brown Bag Series

Footer

  • Toggle High Contrast
  • Toggle Font size

Copyright © 2018 William Goren · Disclaimer · Log in